|
Post by pal on Nov 22, 2009 2:08:00 GMT 6
hi all my 04 navara started knocking badly 4 weeks ago 54000 on clock had it lifted to nissan dealer who had not heard about this fault since found out its a new dealership. spoke to nissan who told me i would have to pay £90 per hour for diagnosis they told me not sure what was wrong would need to take off sump quoted 2hours @£90 to do the job service manager rang me to say the job was more involved would take 9 or 10 hours nissan said they would not consider my claim unless i consented to pay for this work car is 6 months over warranty couldn't risk this cost plus new engine have work done elsewhere have i still got a chance of a claim against nissan would welcome any help
|
|
|
Post by Niall Scott on Nov 27, 2009 20:00:40 GMT 6
Hi All I,ve made a freedom of information request to VOSA asking for all details of the conrod issue held by them and all their dealings with nissan.Here is the reply
Niall Scott
weenib@hotmail.com
Dear Mr Scott
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000
I refer to your e-mail of 24th November to Rob Parry requesting information, which we have dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
You asked for all details, including engineers inspection and reports, between VOSA and Nissan regarding the YD2.5 conrod on a Nissan Navara.
Although I can confirm that VOSA does hold information relating to catastrophic engine failure on these vehicles relating to the conrod, VOSA has concluded that this information cannot be disclosed as it falls under the exemption in section 44 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000:
Section 44(1) Information is exempt information if its disclosure (otherwise than under this Act) by the public authority holding it – is prohibited by or under any enactment
VOSA believes that the Enterprise Act 2002 prohibits the disclosure of the requested information. The following should explain the application of this Act:
Under the General Product Safety Regulations 2005 (GPSR), producers shall not place a product on the market unless it is safe and distributors shall monitor the safety of a product placed on the market. In addition, distributors shall cooperate with the enforcement authority to avoid risks. Failing to meet these duties is a criminal offence. As the authority responsible for vehicle safety, VOSA is considered an “enforcement authority” under these Regulations.
Based on the above, it is considered that information passed to VOSA by a producer for the purposes of any investigation into a potential safety defect has come to VOSA in connection with the functions it has by virtue of the GPSR. Information which comes to a public authority in connection with such a function constitutes “specified information” for the purposes of the Enterprise Act 2002. This is laid out in section 238(1) of the Enterprise Act.
The Enterprise Act (Section 237) makes it an offence to disclose specified information which relates to the affairs of an individual or the business of an undertaking whilst that individual/undertaking continues in existence.
In the case of a recall, where a safety defect has been identified, VOSA accepts that it has a responsibility to release certain information about that recall to the public. Section 39 of the GPSR states that an enforcement authority shall make available to the public such information relating to the nature of the risk, the product identification and the measures taken in respect of the risk. However, the Regulations state that this responsibility shall not apply to “any information obtained by an enforcement authority for the purposes of these Regulations which, by its nature, is covered by professional secrecy, unless the circumstances require such information to be made public in order to protect the health and safety of consumers”.
VOSA considers that it has made available as much information as is necessary for the protection of consumer health and safety and that a release of any further documentation would be exceeding this responsibility and would place VOSA in breach of the Enterprise Act.
If you have any queries about this letter, please contact us, quoting reference F0002288.
If you are unhappy with the response provided, you may ask for an internal review. To request an internal review, please write to:
VOSA Corporate Office, Berkeley House, Croydon Street, Bristol, BS5 0DA
or email vosa.corporateoffice@vosa.gsi.gov.uk
giving the reasons for your dissatisfaction. It will help us if you quote the reference number for your case.
If you do not agree with the outcome of the internal review, you may lodge an appeal with the Information Commissioner (www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk). The Information Commissioner is an independent official appointed by the Crown to oversee the Data Protection Act 1998, the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004.
The Information Commissioner can consider complaints about any aspect of the way in which requests for information have been handled. Please note: the Information Commissioner would be unlikely to consider your complaint if you have not first requested an internal review.
You can write to the Information Commissioner at:
The Information Commissioner’s Office Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF
Yours sincerely
C G PURNELL VOSA Information Access -----I,ve not finished with this yet and will inform you all later of developments Regards Niall
|
|